The Demand Side Grid Support (DSGS) Program: Participation Rates Across California — The 2035 Initiative
2035The Demand Side Grid Support (DSGS) Program: Participation Rates Across California
Read the full report →

The Demand Side Grid Support (DSGS) Program: Participation Rates Across California

DSGS is California's only statewide virtual power plant. In less than three years it has scaled to more than 1 GW of dispatchable capacity, as large as a nuclear plant, with over 203,000 sites enrolled across every legislative district in the state. The program is only funded through the end of 2026.

A California city skyline at night
More than 203,000 sites across California now help support the grid during peak demand.
Scroll to explore
0
sites enrolled in 2025 (Options 3 & 4)
0MW
nameplate capacity, about San Francisco's peak demand
0%
of counties participate (53 of 58) — plus 100% of legislative districts
1 in 4
enrolled sites are in counties where the median solar adopter earns under $100,000

What is DSGS?

California's only statewide virtual power plant

DSGS coordinates distributed energy resources, primarily home battery systems, to provide clean emergency capacity, protect ratepayers from price spikes, and ease the transition away from fossil-fueled peaker plants.

A two-to-one return for ratepayers

Independent analysis by the Brattle Group estimates DSGS returns roughly two dollars in system value for every dollar invested — up to $206 million in net savings for ratepayers if funded through 2028.

Built on devices Californians already own

Option 3 networks home battery systems; Option 4 enrolls smart thermostats and other eligible load-reduction devices. Both are dispatched during grid stress to prevent shortages.

A clean alternative to peaker plants

Contracts for aging fossil-fueled peaker plants expire at the end of 2026. DSGS provides a low-cost, clean way to meet peak demand as those plants retire.

Inexpensive to run

From 2022 to 2025, $13 million in administrative costs unlocked 1,145 MW of capacity, while $62.5 million went directly to participating customers. The program is not paid for by ratepayers.

What we did

How we measured participation

Official enrollment data

California Energy Commission

We started from the CEC's official Option 3 and Option 4 participation records for the 2025 program year: more than 203,000 enrolled sites and their nameplate capacity.

Mapped to every district

Senate, Assembly, and county

Each site was assigned to its State Senate district, Assembly district, and county, then divided by U.S. Census 2020 population to compare participation on a per-capita basis.

Cross-referenced with income

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

We joined county-level participation with LBNL solar-adopter income estimates to gauge whether the program reaches lower- and middle-income communities.

Most participation comes from home battery storage

203,867 sites enrolled in 2025
  • Option 3 — Market-Aware Storage VPP63.4%
  • Option 4 — Emergency Load Flexibility VPP36.6%
Option 3 enrolls 129,286 home-battery sites and supplies 86% of total capacity (1,176 MW). Option 4 adds 74,581 smart thermostats and flexible-load devices.

Geographic reach

Strong participation across California

Counties are shaded by DSGS sites per 1,000 residents. Scroll to see where participation is strongest — from the top counties by enrollment to every Assembly and Senate district.

53 / 58

California counties participate

DSGS has enrolled sites in 91% of California's 58 counties. Only five sparsely populated northern counties have no participation yet.

Top 10 counties by sites
San Diego37,103
Los Angeles26,044
Riverside22,211
Orange21,190
San Bernardino20,507
Kern7,154
Ventura6,965
Contra Costa6,221
Fresno6,119
Santa Clara5,776
80 / 80

Every Assembly district

All 80 Assembly districts have DSGS participants. AD-76 leads with 7,780 enrollments, followed by AD-71 and AD-75.

Top 10 Assembly districts by sites
AD-76 · Darshana Patel (D)7,780
AD-71 · Kate Sanchez (R)7,714
AD-75 · Carl DeMaio (R)7,317
AD-74 · Laurie Davies (R)6,074
AD-47 · Greg Wallis (R)5,921
AD-77 · Tasha Boerner (D)5,700
AD-34 · Tom Lackey (R)5,607
AD-63 · Bill Essayli (R)5,565
AD-42 · Jacqui Irwin (D)5,488
AD-32 · Stan Ellis (R)5,251
40 / 40

Every Senate district

All 40 state Senate districts have participants as well. SD-40 leads with 14,673 enrollments, followed by SD-38 and SD-32.

Top 10 Senate districts by sites
SD-40 · Brian W. Jones (R)14,673
SD-38 · Catherine Blakespear (D)12,479
SD-32 · Kelly Seyarto (R)12,145
SD-23 · Suzette Martinez Valladares (R)11,381
SD-19 · Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh (R)10,150
SD-39 · Akilah Weber Pierson (D)9,348
SD-37 · Steven Choi (R)8,324
SD-12 · Shannon Grove (R)8,317
SD-16 · Melissa Hurtado (D)7,846
SD-29 · Eloise Gomez Reyes (D)7,666
DSGS sites per 1,000 residents · by county
0612+
Continuous scale; 12+ sites per 1,000 residents shows as the darkest shade.

Explore the interactive web tool →

Income and equity

Strong participation in lower-income communities

DSGS is a program for all Californians, including lower-income customers. County-level income data from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory shows the program reaching working- and middle-class communities, not only affluent ones.

46.5%

of California solar adopters are LMI

Nearly half qualify as low-to-moderate income, earning below 120% of their area median income; one in four earn below 80%.

7.7 per 1,000

highest participation of any income group

Counties in the lowest solar-adopter income quintile average 7.7 DSGS sites per 1,000 residents, the highest rate of any quintile.

~49,000 sites

in counties with lower-income adopters

One in four DSGS sites are in counties where the median solar adopter earns below $100,000, including San Bernardino, Kern, Fresno, and Tulare.

What's at stake

A proven program about to run out of funding

DSGS reached this scale on a fraction of its budget. Authorized for $314 million under AB 205, it has retained just $109.5 million after 2024 clawbacks. The program was left out of the 2025–26 state budget and is expected to exhaust its funds by the end of 2026.

DSGS funding: authorized vs. retained

The program delivered more than 1 GW of capacity with about a third of the money it was promised.

Authorized (AB 205, 2023)$314M
Retained after 2024 clawbacks$109.5M · 35%
$206M
Independent analysis by the Brattle Group estimates DSGS could generate $206 million in net system cost savings for California ratepayers if funded through 2028.

Summary

More than 200,000 California households are making the grid cleaner, cheaper, and more reliable

DSGS has shown that a statewide virtual power plant can scale quickly, deliver clean electricity at low cost, and reach communities across the income spectrum. Continued investment would protect ratepayers, strengthen reliability, and expand equitable access to distributed energy.

Sources

1. Stokes, L. C. The Demand Side Grid Support (DSGS) Program: Participation Rates Across California. The 2035 Initiative, UC Santa Barbara, April 2026.

2. California Energy Commission. Demand Side Grid Support Program, Options 3 and 4 participation data, 2025 program year.

3. Hledik, R., Peters, K., and Lohiya, P. The Demand Side Grid Support Program: An Assessment of Scale and Value. The Brattle Group, December 2025 Update.

4. Elmallah, S., Forrester, S., Barbose, G., O'Shaughnessy, E., and Wiser, R. Residential Solar-Adopter Income and Demographic Trends: 2024 Update. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, December 2024.

5. Per-capita rates use U.S. Census 2020 county population. CalEnviroScreen and population data join via the project datasets.

The 2035 Initiative · UC Santa Barbara The Demand Side Grid Support (DSGS) Program: Participation Rates Across California · April 2026
This page summarizes the report and is not a substitute for it. Figures are drawn from California Energy Commission participation data and the full report by Leah C. Stokes.